|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |

Lord Zim
1030
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 15:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
Lukas Rox wrote:The only problem is I think you just made yourself Goonswarm's enemy No1 ;-) (unless Mittani created OTEC purely for Trolling purposes in which case he has succeeded again). Except we've been very, very vocal for years about tech being a problem.
Selective memory, thy name is pubbie. |

Lord Zim
1030
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 15:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
The tears are strong with this one.
Fiberton wrote:You mean they may have had prior knowledge before the invastion because of some ccp or ex ccp were in the CFC ?.. say it is not so ? Tippia wrote:In before GÇ£but all those lower-tier moons are in newly claimed CFC space! Raaahrr CCPSwarm!GÇ¥ 
|

Lord Zim
1030
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 15:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tippia wrote:In T1 terms, it would be like if you could create Isogen by banging Veldspar and Scordite mmm miner-ore threesomes |

Lord Zim
1030
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 15:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
Zyress wrote:Retmas wrote:too damn cute that cobalt replaces tech, and is primarily found in the regions the CFC just roflstomped. and this is surprising how? throw tinfoil at me if you must but if it looks like a duck quacks like a duck and gets in my way when I'm fishing, its a duck Have a trip up mount tinfoil, I'm sure Jade'd love to have someone to talk to. |

Lord Zim
1031
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 16:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
Aprudena Gist wrote:R0ot wrote:So am I the only one around here that thinks it would just be infinitely easier to randomize the moons again and spread Tech moons around all regions instead of limited to one particular "area".
Good Idea / Bad Idea? Yes because scanning every single moon in the game again sounds like good gameplay design. ooh oooh ooh I know I know I know the solution let's make all moon content rotate every 3 months it'll be awesome and it'll create fights come on guys it'll be awesome |

Lord Zim
1034
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 16:43:00 -
[6] - Quote
but that implies spending money, I just want to make things for free! |

Lord Zim
1036
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 16:46:00 -
[7] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:lol so we going to see a special dislike button too so all the Goons can dogpile you? Yes, we'll dislike it when CCP finally do what we tell them they should've done years ago. |

Lord Zim
1036
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 16:50:00 -
[8] - Quote
Hustomte wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote: let me introduce you to a feature of eve called "buying things on the market"
EvilweaselSA = "Buy Tech on the market as well while you're at it, this alchemy thing is silly" ... I see you missed the point of the Devblog and everything else.  let me introduce you to this concept of "reading quotes". The guy EvilweaselSA was quoting talked about isogen and zydrine, not tech. |

Lord Zim
1039
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 17:16:00 -
[9] - Quote
Fiberton wrote:Hrm you think no one who use to work for CCP is in the CFC ? haha.. Dude you know better but regardless least they are playing eve now. No I have no idea who they are. I am only speculating of course. Just look at all these bitter tears, honestly you can't even tell we burnt his house down just a week or two ago. |

Lord Zim
1039
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 17:40:00 -
[10] - Quote
ORCACommander wrote:i was expecting a bit more than just increased alchemy diversity. how about depletable moons that once depleted have the moongoo hot spot change to a different mood randomly in new eden? that furthers ccp's goal of encouraging warfare :) ORCA "hasn't scanned regions full of moons yet" Commander unironically chipping in. |
|

Lord Zim
1039
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 17:46:00 -
[11] - Quote
"hey guys guys you should really fix tech"
*many years passes*
"hey guys so we finally fixed tech"
This process really leads itself to this:
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:Goon tears incomming, well done CCP, thanks for fixing this design failure that has been exploited too long :)
(christ, some people are so thick) |

Lord Zim
1039
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 17:52:00 -
[12] - Quote
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:Goon tears incomming, well done CCP, thanks for fixing this design failure that has been exploited too long :) ahahahahahahaha i would stfu, if my alliance fc's lead fleets full of goon shitheads only because he can suck mittens tech ****** ;) ahahahahahahahahahaha lookit dat bitter |

Lord Zim
1041
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 17:58:00 -
[13] - Quote
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:sorry you'r wrong we had one year of tech and our corp is so incredible rich now, you cant believe it :D Sure you are. That's why you're posting like an angry poor.
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:but really, i would never fly for any isk fly with goons ;) but i know pl is different And this, this is why you're an angry poor. |

Lord Zim
1042
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 18:14:00 -
[14] - Quote
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:yeah we have enough of pvp, we retired to mining and sanctum chaining ;) Playing against other people was too exciting, so we went for the most boring activities in the game, instead. :haw: |

Lord Zim
1043
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 18:23:00 -
[15] - Quote
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:yeah thats why this noobs still killed 100b more ;) Hey guys guys we killed more so we won the isk war
*loses all space*
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer wrote:and talking of quality while shadoo fcs drakefleets is kinda ironic :D You don't understand the quality of tenacity. |

Lord Zim
1043
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 18:32:00 -
[16] - Quote
b-b-b-but the killboard says... |

Lord Zim
1043
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 18:41:00 -
[17] - Quote
Are you really so angry you can't even spell properly? |

Lord Zim
1045
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:14:00 -
[18] - Quote
Oh god, now I definitely need to run and buy popcorn, this is getting positively awful. :bunchies: |

Lord Zim
1045
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:21:00 -
[19] - Quote
I guess this is when we start talking about removing ice from hisec? |

Lord Zim
1047
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:59:00 -
[20] - Quote
Fiberton wrote:Young man you fail to realize my corp was ecstatic to live in NPC space. Have a great day. Fly safe Gentlemen. Lord Zim wrote:Fiberton wrote:Hrm you think no one who use to work for CCP is in the CFC ? haha.. Dude you know better but regardless least they are playing eve now. No I have no idea who they are. I am only speculating of course. Just look at all these bitter tears, honestly you can't even tell we burnt his house down just a week or two ago. ~didn't want that space anyway~
~we're finally free to wulfpax our way to irrelevance, and we're positively loving it~
~but our k/d ratio~
~our killboard is green~ |
|

Lord Zim
1047
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 20:37:00 -
[21] - Quote
The worst thing about Fiberton's posting is, he's actually unironically topposting. |

Lord Zim
1047
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 20:48:00 -
[22] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Lord Zim wrote:The worst thing about Fiberton's posting is, he's actually unironically topposting. fReEdOm of SpeEch if U dOn'T lIKE iT DONT reAd iT I'm sending attack kittens to your door, right now. |

Lord Zim
1048
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 21:18:00 -
[23] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:yeah, if mining raw cobalt and platinum is only slightly less proftable then transmuting them to Technetium, that means alchemy+ at razor-slim profit margins is barely more efficient then technetium trade which is saddled by a markup of thousands of percentage. which means this solves very little except capping tech prices at their present value which CCP Fozzy described as "broken". Much like your alliances push a few months ago to go harass towers, you just don't get it. so nico turned down your bro love offer too eh? wow grath you keep on getting rejected... no wonder you are soo bitter... but alas worry not... i still lub you  Actually, the bropact seems to be pretty much alive and kicking at this point. |

Lord Zim
1048
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 21:40:00 -
[24] - Quote
So not even good **** to share with your adversaries after a good spacefuck?
Nicolo, I am disappointed. |

Lord Zim
1048
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 22:02:00 -
[25] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Lord Zim wrote:So not even good **** to share with your adversaries after a good spacefuck?
Nicolo, I am disappointed. no local chat is what makes us elite, like those masked sandninjas in 300 No **** in local makes this goon :smith: |

Lord Zim
1048
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 22:25:00 -
[26] - Quote
aww boo hoo your alliances (which still shouldn't be poor even though they may not have had tech) can't do a proper ship replacement programme? well shucks, kick them in the nuts until they offer it. |

Lord Zim
1052
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 22:54:00 -
[27] - Quote
It's not in "one region", hth. |

Lord Zim
1071
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 08:39:00 -
[28] - Quote
Dilly Dallyer2 wrote:One totaly unrelated game mechanic that could also break the Tech monopoly would be to make standings based on player actions, not just a click of a button. Too much of the game is blue to each other. Indiscretions done to an Alliance should not be so easily forgotten. ahahahahahahahahaha
"please CCP make it harder to be friends because I can't do squat to them waaaaaaaaaah" |

Lord Zim
1072
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 08:46:00 -
[29] - Quote
Dilly Dallyer2 wrote:No you can be blue with anyone, just not shoot them in the morning and be their best friend in the afternoon
What if that's the kind of friendship we want? |

Lord Zim
1072
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 08:55:00 -
[30] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Andrea Griffin wrote:
I'm putting my money on #2. I like this; this is a good thing. Thank you. Alchemy is an interesting, market driven solution to supply issues in Eve.
You left out option 3: Everybody is saying "about frickin time" There's also option 4:
Everybody saying "about frickin time" except for a few windowlickers who say "ahahaha lookit dem goon tears" and then every goon telling them they're ... "special". |
|

Lord Zim
1072
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 12:26:00 -
[31] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:DanMck wrote:tech is overpowered, without a doubt.
why you thought to change the prom and dyspro set up to a moon mineral only located in the north ? only you CCP can answer.
i can field that one the person who did the dominion rebalance didn't understand how a bottlenecking system works and made tech valuable completely accidentally, when trying to make low-tier moons moderately valuble Pity the entire playerbase didn't tell them before it went live, eh? |

Lord Zim
1072
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 12:39:00 -
[32] - Quote
Mustrum Yanger wrote:I cant wait to see how this plays plays out, its nice to hear PL saying this needs fixing even if it is in a rather quiet voice after they have allready made "trillions" and are sitting pretty and pre lubed, just above the mighty goon **** waiting to bounce up and down or giggle and run away again. Everyone has been saying tech needs fixing since well before the change even went onto TQ. Everyone. |

Lord Zim
1073
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 13:08:00 -
[33] - Quote
YES LET'S GO FOR DEPLETING MOONS BECAUSE SCANNING MOONS IS SO MUCH FUN FOO DIGGITY LET'S DO THIS **** |

Lord Zim
1073
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 13:25:00 -
[34] - Quote
Well duh, we never brought the ships makalu would fight. His list got pretty long towards the end there. |

Lord Zim
1073
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 14:15:00 -
[35] - Quote
:catstare: |

Lord Zim
1073
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 14:32:00 -
[36] - Quote
What you mean is, they lose big, not loose big. |

Lord Zim
1074
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 16:13:00 -
[37] - Quote
Huh, we haven't even kicked you out of your space yet, and you're crying this badly? |

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 17:19:00 -
[38] - Quote
Odracir Atosc wrote:Don't worry, really, as soon these changes hit, the average CFC grunt is going to suffer badly. Sure there are trillions of isks in the hands of a couple of alliances, but those isk's are in the hands of only a minority of players.
You think they are going to subside the alliance running costs, reimbursement programs and tons of other stuff, with their own wallets ?... And you guys called mittens delusional. Oy vey do I have news for you. |

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 17:35:00 -
[39] - Quote
We have allies, not pets. |

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 18:07:00 -
[40] - Quote
Allies: get stuff to do more stuff. Pets: pay for stuff.
vOv |
|

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 18:43:00 -
[41] - Quote
Dyspro/prom made a good goal for people to aim for, too, and that was spread around evenly across the entire universe, it was an R64 and it was priced at 80/100k/unit, and CCP still changed that. vOv |

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 19:00:00 -
[42] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Allies: get stuff to do more stuff. Pets: pay for stuff.
vOv The most I would classify your allies would be "vassal" allies... And? |

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 19:52:00 -
[43] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:I just donGÇÖt like you claiming you are any different then any of the other coalitions that have all risen and fallen in the past. Sucks to be you, then, because we are. I'm not going to bother explaining it to you, again, since you'll just completely ignore it just like you do the facts Grath come up with.
MeBiatch wrote:When in reality you are the same just under different circumstances which allow you to be nicer and more lenient to your petsGǪ Nope. We treated our allies the same way back before we had tech.
MeBiatch wrote:But when tech II production is fixed I would be shocked if you were able to continue the way you operateGǪ Prepare to be shocked, I guess. vOv
MeBiatch wrote:Personally I do hope that parts of the CFC collapse At some point this'll happen, but tech (or lack thereof) won't be the cause. |

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 20:24:00 -
[44] - Quote
You're so desperate in your hope that we're just some big evil despot, ready to start whipping everyone the instant tech is nerfed.
It'd be hilarious to see just how disappointed you are going to be when that doesn't come to pass. |

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 21:02:00 -
[45] - Quote
And being "the bad guy" is something we manage just fine without treating our allies like ****. Just ask hulk pilots in hisec.
And the CFC being a well-cohesive group has little to do with "the game health", the problem is more the fact that everyone else are complete **** who lose whole wars in anything from a few weeks to ... 2 days.
Wolodymyr wrote:A pet is someone who is allowed to live in their space or hold their assets as long as they do what their owners tell them to. For example Black Mark was told that their killboard wasn't impressive enough or their CTA participation wasn't good enough and they were kicked out of their space. Some people would also argue that PL is a goon pet because the CFC is sitting on top of their tech moons. First of all, t here are no CTAs. Second of all, we can't please people if we suck in everyone we can find, and we can't please everyone if we actually try to get people in our coalition to actually not suck dicks through a straw.
I guess I'll just have to live with trying to get people in our coalition to not suck dicks through a straw, and still end up having the better space etc for it because everyone else are **** at eve. |

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 21:04:00 -
[46] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:right i blame D3 and Sins rebellion expansion for that one... They're both DRM-infested crap games. |

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 21:14:00 -
[47] - Quote
And it requires you activate the game with stardock's servers, which by default make it ****. Same as I noticed when I tried to start galciv2 and sins trinity the other day after reinstalling the machine, which made those two games ****, too. |

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 21:31:00 -
[48] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:meh its just something you have to get past right? its the future either adapt or never play cool "NEW" games again i guess...
OH AND GAL CIV ii IS THE BOMB!
fing caps lock...
i still play MOO2 from time to time... You're literally part of the problem. Smallpox on your computer. |

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 21:35:00 -
[49] - Quote
0oO0oOoOo0o wrote:Hello CCP Fozzie, in German your name is not very clean, it would translate to CCP Cuntty or CCP Twatty. I'm sure you were not aware of that and propose you just change it. You're literally part of the problem which is the increasingly overly politically correctification of the world. Smallpox on your computer, too. |

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 22:27:00 -
[50] - Quote
Death before online requirement for singleplayer games. :colbert: |
|

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 23:04:00 -
[51] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Death before online requirement for singleplayer games. :colbert: sure and when d3 becomes a single player game sure thing It is. They've apparently managed to fool you into thinking that D3 actually must have an always-on internet connection to run the logic, but there's no part of the game (while you're not playing with others) which should in any way, shape or form require external resources. Nada. Zip. Zilch.
I'll bet you're one of the people who thinks IW were right to remove lean, console, mods and dedicated servers, too. |

Lord Zim
1079
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 23:59:00 -
[52] - Quote
Don't worry, CCP are handholding the awful pubbies who can't fit ships for anything other than "maximum yield". |

Lord Zim
1080
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 00:12:00 -
[53] - Quote
Sure, nerf all the things. We don't need to nerf the lokis and rokhs, though, since if they aren't nerfed, maybe soco might even actually work up the balls to undock and fight for their space. |

Lord Zim
1081
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 14:10:00 -
[54] - Quote
That word, "communist", I don't think you know what it means. |

Lord Zim
1087
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 16:22:00 -
[55] - Quote
I think what needs to happen is that Inspiration needs to be forced to scan down two regions, in one sitting.
I guess we can allow one bathroom break, but no more. |

Lord Zim
1087
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 16:38:00 -
[56] - Quote
Inspiration wrote:Lord Zim wrote:I think what needs to happen is that Inspiration needs to be forced to scan down two regions, in one sitting.
I guess we can allow one bathroom break, but no more. LOL! In a real environment new resources are found and others deplete, requiring "scanning" all the time. THis mechanic is totally absent in moon mining, so you trolling me by proposing I have to scan as if that is an unrealistic amount of work...is well...laughable! You got a pretty poor defense there and the self interest oozes out ! 5 regions, then. |

Lord Zim
1087
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 16:58:00 -
[57] - Quote
Inspiration wrote:You don't have to move far in a good system at all! Missing the point, one post at a time. |

Lord Zim
1087
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 17:03:00 -
[58] - Quote
Inspiration wrote:* Very moon (bar high sec, as that cannot be mined) is scanned, often multiple times. One moon being scanned by one guy/alliance doesn't mean the rest of the eve universe knows what's going on there.
Inspiration wrote:* Every relevant moon can be found in public databases. Wrong.
Inspiration wrote:* Of course alliances will try to keep moon information as secret as possible, but that will never change. Which means that everyone has to scan every moon in the entire eve universe. And if you're going to make this a depletable bullshit mechanic, you have to do that every month or 3 months or whatever the ****.
Inspiration wrote:* Even so, statistics for null sec are available and public and have been for years! Wrong. |

Lord Zim
1087
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 17:19:00 -
[59] - Quote
Look at you, assuming that information is actually 100% correct. |

Lord Zim
1087
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 17:31:00 -
[60] - Quote
Ahh, the sounds of a defeated forum combatant. |
|

Lord Zim
1087
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 20:00:00 -
[61] - Quote
It's almost as if people have forgotten how the old moneymoons were spread pretty evenly across all space, before CCP ****** it all up. |

Lord Zim
1087
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 22:27:00 -
[62] - Quote
Dr 0wnage wrote:I see the logic behind this, but its still a reaction to the symptoms and not the problem itself. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt however as you say the real solution in coming.
Personally, i would like to see depleting moons with random spawns of new materials. Give all moons a finite amount of resources, and when depleted, they would respawn somewhere else in new eden. This should be quite simple to implement and would solve nearly all of our current moongoo problems.
-Rare goo being confined to one part of space would be solved by random seeding. -Rare goo being controlled by only the largest alliances would be largely solved by the unknown locations of new goo deposits.
This system could allow WH systems to produce goo as well making moon surveying in unknown space a profession.
Adjusting respawn consistency and amounts would allow ccp to somewhat adjust the supply of goo for when asteroid belt mining is implemented.
I simply don't see any downsides to this idea... Then let's make you scan a region or 3 every 3 months, let's see how long it takes before you commit eve suicide. |

Lord Zim
1087
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 22:50:00 -
[63] - Quote
Dr 0wnage wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Then let's make you scan a region or 3 every 3 months, let's see how long it takes before you commit eve suicide. You don't have to, there's people who will and will be more then happy to sell you the information. There's certainly not enough grinding in the game as it is, let's MAKE MORE.
And :laffo: if you're going to even think this'll make tech (or any moongoo) any less of a limited supply.
Dr 0wnage wrote:WH systems are far from unassailable. Yes, you can't take 20 erebus, 15 avatars, and 40 nyxs in to do it so i can see why you guys might have a problem with this... Yes, let's make sure wormholes, which are already :laffo: profitable, are even more profitable. |

Lord Zim
1087
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 23:07:00 -
[64] - Quote
And what you're missing is the downtime which'll happen, how much time is going to be spent tearing down POSes all over the place, what'll happen when JB towers happen to be on the new tech (or whatever it is) moon, what happens if someone's reaction or component manufacturing or supercap manufacturing POS etc etc etc is on the moon.
And this is before we even start talking about the act of actually finding the things, and you're also completely ignoring the fact that with this dynamic system there is absolutely no incentive at all to even contemplate trying to take someone's moneymoons (or even go to war over them). |

Lord Zim
1090
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 10:00:00 -
[65] - Quote
Inspiration wrote:Every moon i double checked years ago was correct, its a good start. As for hostile alliance space, just scan the mining towers they have, ignore all else and you get the good picture rather quick, all hard effort will be done for you by your enemy. I guess that's why, when we scanned our area, we found tons of tech moons which weren't towered and weren't on dotlan?
Inspiration wrote:So it is not an issue at all that not every single noob can publicly see where the best moons are in all of EVE. Simply because they can;t do anything with it anyway! I love how you assume that the dotlan information is accurate. It's so cute.
Inspiration wrote:Random moonshifts and depletion and that sort of stuff can be implemented without influence on territorial warfare. It will change however the passive nature of moon mining into an active one (no longer with towers) So why should I bother going to war for any particular space, when all I have to do is hold tons of currently worthless space and see where the lottery takes me?
Inspiration wrote:And the scanning mechanism can work just like with exploration, and you could enhance systems you control. It wouldn't be totally random either, an area rich in X will keep rich in X, just need to find the details. Other regions will have smaller amount of X too now and then, but with less chance to find it. You're missing the whole downtime which'll happen, how much time is going to be spent tearing down POSes all over the place, what'll happen when JB towers happen to be on the new tech (or whatever it is) moon, what happens if someone's reaction or component manufacturing or supercap manufacturing POS etc etc etc is on the moon.
And this is before we even start talking about the act of actually finding the things, and you're also completely ignoring the fact that with this dynamic system there is absolutely no incentive at all to even contemplate trying to take someone's moneymoons (or even go to war over them). It's easier to just take a fuckload of space and wait.
Inspiration wrote:Everyone happy! Except everyone who has to run around scanning moons all day long, everyone who has to pay the people to scan moons, everyone who has to shuffle towers around, and last but not least everyone who has to pay for both the scanning of moons, moving of POSes and the downtime before new moons are found with ... higher prices for moongoo.
But hey, if you absolutely want to make T2 even harder to run around in, go right ahead, don't let me stop you. |

Lord Zim
1093
|
Posted - 2012.07.24 17:29:00 -
[66] - Quote
Buy all the things. |

Lord Zim
1093
|
Posted - 2012.07.24 18:28:00 -
[67] - Quote
At least all POS fuel'll be cheap as chips when everyone dogpile into botting up a metric fucktonne of the topes, which means T2 ships'll cost less, which means that monetary inflation end up making losses hurt even less now than before.
It'll be awesome. |

Lord Zim
1094
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 02:35:00 -
[68] - Quote
Funny, and here I thought the point of nullsec WAS to be a player-run empire.
Granted, with lots of death happening, but still a player-run empire. |

Lord Zim
1094
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 02:51:00 -
[69] - Quote
3 reasons to hold space prior to patch: 1) Moons. 2) Build supercaps. 3) **** off someone who wanted the space you just took away from them.
Post patch: 1) Build supercaps 2) **** off someone who wanted the space you took away from them.
Ahh, progress. |

Lord Zim
1097
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 11:34:00 -
[70] - Quote
So what you're saying is, we're in fact puppetmastering CCP into ruining their own game to spite us? |
|

Lord Zim
1097
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 11:50:00 -
[71] - Quote
Funnily enough, so too do botters, and you'll see this in various prices soon enough. |

Lord Zim
1098
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 13:35:00 -
[72] - Quote
Hammer Legion Member wrote:Richard Desturned wrote: The NC was nowhere near as organized as the CFC is. Even the GBC lacked that level of organization.
haha not like you could speak out of personnal experience, can you? GBC and NC were basicly nothing different to the current CFC...Goons didnt invent the Coalition either. You just proved that you have absolutely no clue about how the CFC is organized, or you at least have a huge misunderstanding in how the NC was organized. |

Lord Zim
1098
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 13:47:00 -
[73] - Quote
25k. |

Lord Zim
1098
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 13:57:00 -
[74] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:The true revelations of the Delve war were that OTEC are so overwhelming that one of the most "anticipated wars in EVE" ended in less than a week because the other 0.0 alliances realized it would be financial ruin to face up against OTEC in an extended war scenario because of the sheer volume of income available. No, the true revelation of the delve war is that -A- is ****, and Makalu's greatest enemy is a rifterbro with a web. Or someone ECMing him. Or any enemy bringing any ship not on his specific list of "acceptable sparring partner ships", he'll just dock the fleet up.
And that any coalition where -A- is the core alliance is bound to fail, as we saw when they said "welp back to stain" within 48 hours of the initial proclamation of war. |

Lord Zim
1098
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 14:02:00 -
[75] - Quote
Hammer Legion Member wrote:sorry if thats off-topic, but doesnt give that kind of information CSM Members (and their friends, eventually) an advantage over other players in order of speculation etc? You need a TLA: NDA. |

Lord Zim
1099
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:20:00 -
[76] - Quote
kick fcon reset btls |

Lord Zim
1099
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 19:38:00 -
[77] - Quote
Hammer Legion Member wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote: hi You should try to ask that in the right thread regards HML It's interrelated. |

Lord Zim
1099
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 20:51:00 -
[78] - Quote
"I'm not a mod but I'm going to pretend I am one" - HML |

Lord Zim
1099
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 21:25:00 -
[79] - Quote
You're all terrible, and those who actually, unironically sign their posts are doubly terrible. |

Lord Zim
1126
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 12:54:00 -
[80] - Quote
Valea Silpha wrote:Particularly now that t3 ships are de rigeur for srspvp As long as the enemy they're facing is on makalu's list of acceptable foe ships, obviously. |
|

Lord Zim
1127
|
Posted - 2012.08.08 17:15:00 -
[81] - Quote
Because people like you make it a necessity to force you to PVP. |
|
|
|